Here comes the finger pointing.
After narrowly losing the House majority, some Republicans are second-guessing the strategies of the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), including claims there was a priority toward backers of President Donald Trump versus focusing on more winnable races, The Hill reported.
"Among conservatives, there is definitely some disgruntlement because some of the members in more winnable seats are conservative, and it's not like they were just putting some money into [Virginia GOP Rep. Barbara] Comstock's district — it was ungodly amounts," a GOP source told The Hill.
"It was just money that was flushed down the drain, you know, the polling consistently came back that the money wasn't helping."
Among the claims against the NRCC included allowing too many Republicans to retire, not spending enough on some vulnerable races — notably those who were not as supportive of President Trump — according to the report.
"I think overall the entire NRCC operation this cycle is a tremendous disappointment," a former NRCC aide told The Hill. "They did not keep retirements low, they had the lowest spending on IE [independent expenditures] in the last five cycles, they misused resources and spent in places that we had no chance of winning, for example, Colorado 6 and Virginia 10."
Rep. Comstock and Rep. Mike Coffman, R-Colo., had long been projected to lose, but had ample money infused into their campaigns, while Reps. Scott Taylor, R-Va., Dave Brat, R-Va., and Dan Donovan, R-N.Y., got less amid closer races, per The Hill.
Rep. Steve Stivers, R-Ohio, has announced he will not seek another term as the NRCC Chairman, according to the report.